All these analyses provide important information on a dimension of the consequences of silviculture and arboriculture, particularly with respect to afforestation and urban greening. Examples include a focus on raw materials for the timber industry (Minckler, 1941 Nieuwenhuis & Williamson, 1993) mitigating the impact of agricultural ammonia emissions (Bealey et al., 2016) reducing the salinity of waterways (Cleary et al., 2010) urban benefits (Grant, 2016 Mersey Forest, 2014 Summit & Sommer, 1998) such as heat mitigation (Morakinyo et al., 2020) and reducing the risks of skin cancer for commuting pedestrians (Langenheim et al., 2020) biodiversity (Betts et al., 2021) poverty reduction (Leakey et al., 2005), mental health benefits for visitors (Maes et al., 2021) the enhancement of farming incomes (Asaah et al., 2011 Jack & Santos, 2017) and, increasingly, greenhouse gas storage (Bradfer-Lawrence et al., 2021). ![]() However, a review of this literature shows that the definition of ‘right’ varies widely across studies further expanded by the more recent extension to find ‘The Right Tree for the Right Place for the Right Reason’ (Broadmeadow, 2020), in the right way (Buchan, 2021).ĭefinitions of the ‘right’ set of issues to consider in determining planting decisions have often been highly constrained and differ fundamentally across studies. ![]() Determining ‘The Right Tree for the Right Place’ has been a consistent focus for academic research from the first publication with that title during WW2 (Minckler, 1941) up to the present day (Di Sacco et al., 2021).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |